God or Everything Else? Part 3
Esther was an orphan Jewish girl in a foreign land. She was a minority on multiple counts. Firstly, her parents were gone. Secondly, she was a girl, a woman- which obviously had very insignificant place in a society dominated by men. Thirdly, she was an alien in a godless pagan land which did not worship Jehovah. On all counts her identity worked against her. What identity did a woman have in her days? And the identity she derived from her parents? Or what about her cultural heritage? Living in a pagan land probably made that distant, especially when she had to live in the palace of a pagan king and get used to the regimented lifestyle of those in his harem.
One thing that Esther did have was her cousin Mordecai who adopted her. From him, she maintained a connection with her cultural heritage but more importantly, it was from him that she learned the value of a relationship- that he would take it upon himself to raise her up, to mentor her, to father her despite the fact that she was an orphan.
When Esther was gathered into the royal harem, she had all the excuse to indulge in whatever she wanted. For one so insignificant, one so seemingly deprived of womanly adornment, she had all the excuse to bolster her identity with material possessions at the king's court. However, one interesting thing about her is that the Bible tells us that she asked for nothing else apart from what Hegai the Eunuch suggested! This was certainly unusual for surely her contemporaries would have asked for all manner of material possessions and adornments that they desired but Esther only asked for what Hegai suggested, because she knew that Hegai knew what the king desired.
Esther's identity was not measured by her outward appearance or material adornments but by the worth of her character. Esther means "I will be hidden" and her Jewish name Hadassah means "myrtle", a fragrant but bitter plant. Esther was hidden. She was not known for who she projected herself to be on the outside but rather for the fragrance of her character. More than the king's possessions, she knew that the far greater prize was the king himself. And more than her outward beauty, she knew that she herself was the king's prize. Her identity and worth was not founded upon what she could gain by being in the king's harem but on her favour and relationship with the king. It was this which elevated her at the highest seat of power that belonged to any woman in that vast land.
Reflecting on Esther's story, it makes me wonder how many times we base our indentity on our "everything else" except on our relationship with the King. Many times, our pursuit of material gain or career or academic excellence actually comes from a deep-seated insecurity which expresses itself in an attempt to envelop ourselves with an externally-determined identity. The fig leaves that Adam and Eve wore in the garden were a prototype of this other-clothing that is a counterfeit to the glory of God! Esther had far greater reason to be insecure of her identity or lack thereof but Mordecai taught her the value of relationship. Mordecai is symbollic of the Spirit of adoption/sonship (see Romans 8) that God has put into our hearts to bear the testimony that He is Father to us! Often the reason why we're not secure of our identity and therefore seek to adorn ourselves with external ornaments to bolster our sense of self-worth is because we have unfathered areas in our lives. This is an expression of the orphan spirit that many a times governs our thinking, But we have Abba now and Abba sees our deepest needs and provides for us- yes including our deep-seated mental and emotional needs!
The confidence of having a Father caused Esther not to put her sense of self-worth or security on her external possessions. Her worth was not founded upon external things. That is why, though having been placed at the high seat of authority in the land, she was willing to give it all up for a greater purpose. Esther said that if she her people were merely sold as slaves, it would not justify bothering the king. Power and possession didn't matter to her. More than that, she was the one who risked her life in intercession, telling Mordecai "If I perish, I perish." If we are defined by the "everything else", how then can we be capable of such nobility? The fact of the matter is that we cannot be counted worthy of such great authority unless we have the great inward quality and capacity to possess it- the great virtue of being able to relinquish. Esther's security was placed neither in titles nor possessions nor political power. We are likewise not defined by the "everything else" that we may try to adorn ourselves with but by the simple unconditional love of Abba Father. Truly those who are likewise secure in their identity in God and know how to relinquish lowly incomparable things will have such a capacity for great authority. Blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the earth.
Pleasing the king meant more to Esther than the temporary possessions she might have obtained at the harem. And Esther got it right for having the king means having everything! Esther didn't ask for all kinds of things but only that which Hegai the eunuch suggested. She only allowed herself to have only what was necessary to please the king. And so concerning our lives, is our pursuit for the King and for His pleasure? Instead of even the blessings we may receive in that relationship? Are we satisfied with only what is enough, with only what is necessary to grow in our relationship with Him? Or do we find ourselves indulging in many things that don't satisfy? (TV, entertainment, worldly pleasures, etc..) More than that, are we willing to reliquish even our legitimate claim to all these things in order to gain that which is truly valuable? In order to gain Christ who is altogether worthy? Because the value of something is altogether dependent on our pursuit of it!
In examining again the answer to our question- Who has more? Someone who only has God or someone who has God and everything else, I leave a famous quote from Jim Elliot: He is no fool to give what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose.
